Show the model. Show the misses.
Transparent match forecasts, expected-goals projections, assumptions and post-match accountability.
Current tracking: AFC Bournemouth only. Match and starting XI predictions for other teams have not yet been tracked.
Bournemouth Starting XI Predictions
Eleven names. One team sheet. No hiding.
Bournemouth Match Predictions
The scoreline, the outcome, and the accountability.
Ipswich Town 1–2 AFC Bournemouth · Final result
Why 3–1? Bournemouth enter on seven consecutive victories with 19 goals scored. Recent finishing has been particularly strong: 11 goals from 8.23 FotMob xG over the last four matches (+2.77 goals above expectation). Evanilson, Tavernier and Rayan offer multiple routes to goal; Ipswich's home threat makes a clean sheet less certain. Midweek rotation should help Rose restore a fresher league core.
Projected xG: Ipswich 1.12 · Bournemouth 1.85. Model's modal score: 1–1. Editorial pick: 1–3 Bournemouth, reflecting recent finishing form and late attacking depth.
Model disclosure: 100,000 independent Poisson trials with provisional assumed scoring rates; not a fully opponent-adjusted, minute-by-minute substitution model. The 1–3 pick is a later editorial revision, separate from the original published 1–2 graphic and its 47.8% / 23.7% / 28.6% model probabilities. It is distinct from the most likely simulated exact score. Final: Ipswich 1–2 Bournemouth. TAC correctly predicted a Bournemouth win but missed the exact score. The original forecast and its probabilities are retained for transparency.
The pitch doesn't lie.
Each player on the pitch is an original TAC starting-XI pick. Green checks mark correct starters; red crosses mark misses. Scores compare our published prediction with the final result.
Starting XI predictions 49 / 55 correct · 89.1%
Ipswich Town · Nov 8 · Published Nov 7
✓ 11 / 11 PERFECT11/11 confirmed. Christie over Cook was the decisive call. Original lineup published November 7, before the official team sheet. Final: Ipswich 1–2 Bournemouth. Final pre-match editorial score pick: Ipswich 1–3 Bournemouth (correct outcome, incorrect exact score).
Sparta Prague · Nov 5
9 / 1181.8% correct. Silva → Diakité; Tavernier → Brooks. Original 4-2-3-1 published November 4. Original match preview →
Original selection rationale
Rotation-heavy selection following the previous midweek match. Cook and Christie in midfield; Adli, Tavernier and Gannon-Doak behind Rodríguez. Silva and Hill were predicted at centre-back.
Published TAC score prediction: Sparta Prague 0–2 Bournemouth. Actual: Sparta Prague 1–3 Bournemouth; outcome correct, exact score missed.
Manchester United
11 / 11All eleven starters correctly predicted. Position layout is schematic, not an exact tactical map.
Aston Villa
8 / 11Three misses: Smith → Juanlu; Hill → António Silva; Brooks → Adli.
Leeds
10 / 11One miss: Cook predicted; Christie started.
Match predictions 4 completed · 3 / 4 correct outcomes · 0 exact scores
Ipswich Town · Nov 8
✓ OutcomeCorrect Bournemouth win outcome; exact score missed. Final pre-match editorial pick was 1–3, distinct from the earlier 1–2 graphic. Read our preview → · Match review →
Sparta Prague · Nov 5
✓ OutcomeCorrect Bournemouth win outcome; exact score missed (Sparta Prague 1–3 Bournemouth). Read our preview →
Manchester United
✕ MissTAC called a draw; Bournemouth lost.
Leeds
✓ OutcomeTAC correctly called a Bournemouth win; exact score missed.
Lineups are reconstructed from TAC's recorded selections. Position placements are illustrative. Historical publication timestamps and original prediction graphics are not yet linked. These are editorial predictions, not betting odds.
Inside the TAC Prediction Lab
How we estimate match outcomes, project Bournemouth's starting XI and evaluate our calls after the final whistle.
Methodology published: November 3, 2026 · Version 1.0
How match forecasts are produced
TAC forecasts are editorially informed estimates, not the output of a fully automated, independently validated statistical model. We consider recent team performances, underlying chance quality where available (including xG), home advantage, opponent strength, injury and suspension news, fixture congestion, likely rotation and tactical matchups.
We weigh those inputs using football judgment; we do not currently publish a fixed mathematical weighting formula or claim that each percentage comes from a reproducible simulation. When we provide win/draw/loss percentages, they represent our best pre-match assessment and should sum to 100%. Projected scorelines and xG are estimates, not guarantees.
We distinguish confirmed team news from reported information and our own assumptions. A forecast can be updated before kickoff when important news changes, but every update should retain its timestamp and previous published values.
How starting XIs are projected
Our projected XI considers player availability, recent starting selections, minutes played, recovery time, competition priorities, manager rotation patterns, positional roles and opponent-specific tactical needs. Expected substitutions can inform the analysis, but only the 11 predicted starters count toward the starting-XI accuracy tracker.
We identify uncertain selections as judgment calls rather than reporting them as confirmed. The official matchday starting XI is the benchmark for scoring, regardless of whether a predicted player subsequently appears as a substitute.
How accuracy is scored
Match outcome: one correct prediction when the published win, draw or loss selection matches the final result in the competition's applicable match period. Exact score: one correct prediction only when both teams' predicted goal totals match the actual score. Cup extra time and penalty-shootout rules must be stated for each applicable pick.
Starting XI: count each correctly named starter against the official starting lineup. The denominator is 11 per match, so five tracked lineups represent 55 selections. A correctly predicted substitute does not earn starting-XI credit.
We report the sample size alongside accuracy. Small records such as 1/2 match outcomes or 38/44 lineup selections should not be interpreted as proof of long-term predictive skill. As the archive grows, we aim to evaluate probability calibration and error, not merely correct picks.
Publication rules, sources and limitations
Forecast lock: predictions are timestamped when published. Pre-kickoff revisions must be clearly labeled and archived; after kickoff, the forecast is frozen for scoring and cannot be retrospectively edited to improve the record. Results and official starting XIs are checked against competition or club match reports.
Source transparency: we attribute external statistics and team news where they are used, identify the date of each data snapshot and distinguish reported facts from editorial inference. No claim is made that TAC operates a proprietary live-data feed.
Limitations: football outcomes are noisy. Red cards, refereeing decisions, individual errors and late lineup changes can overturn reasonable pre-match expectations. These are analysis and editorial forecasts, not betting advice or bookmaker odds.
TAC forecasts combine available match data, team news and tactical analysis with editorial judgment. We do not currently claim a fully automated or independently validated prediction model. Forecasts may change before kickoff as new information becomes available.
The Simulation Chamber
Set the expected goals. Adjust each squad. See how the probabilities move.
Illustrative starting values, not a verified fixture forecast. Rotation sliders apply a user-defined attacking adjustment only; they do not automatically model defensive changes or substitution timing.
Preparing simulation…
